On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 03:12:34PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:43:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't feel a need to expend a whole lot of sweat there. The existing
>> text is fine, it just bugged me that the code deals with three cases
>> while the comment block only acknowledged two. So I'd just go with
>> what you have in v3.
>
> Thanks, Tom. I have committed v3 then.
Hmm. v3 actually broke the C++ fallback of StaticAssertExpr() and
StaticAssertStmt() (v1 did not), a simple fix being something like
the attached.
The buildfarm does not really care about that, but it could for
example by using the only c++ code compiled in the tree in
src/backend/jit/? That also means that only builds using --with-llvm
with a compiler old enough would trigger that stuff.
--
Michael
