Hi,
On 2019-06-07 12:37:33 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> TableAmRoutine's index_build_range_scan thinks that parameter #8 is
> called end_blockno, but table_index_build_range_scan and
> heapam_index_build_range_scan and BRIN's summarize_range all agree
> that it's the number of blocks to be scanned. I assume that this got
> changed at some point while Andres was hacking on it and this one
> place just never got updated.
Not sure where it came from :/
> Proposed patch attached. Since this seems like a bug, albeit a
> harmless one, I propose to commit this to v12.
Yea, please do!
Greetings,
Andres Freund
