Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works
Date
Msg-id 20180925224223.GB1659@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 12:05:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Actually I think it *is* useful to do it like this, because then the
>> user knows to fix the netmsg.dll problem so that they can continue to
>> investigate the winsock problem.  If we don't report the secondary error
>> message, how are users going to figure out how to fix the problem?
>
> OK, I'm fine with doing it like that if people want it.

+1.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: PG vs macOS Mojave