On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:27:35PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-09-25 11:50:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> PGDLLIMPORT changes don't get back-patched as well...
>
> We've been more aggressive with that lately, and I think that's good. It
> just is a unnecessarily portability barrier for extension to be
> judicious in applying that.
Agreed. Are there any objections with the proposal of changing the
interruption pending flags in miscadmin.h to use sig_atomic_t?
ClientConnectionLost would gain PGDLLIMPORT at the same time.
--
Michael
