Re: PG vs macOS Mojave - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: PG vs macOS Mojave
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=16o51oMvY6K-E_mpSR6mPjm-zgDgY6_RE1VJGriLDPtA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG vs macOS Mojave  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PG vs macOS Mojave
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:14 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:49 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> I've tested this on all the macOS versions I have at hand, and it
> >> doesn't seem to break anything.  Only part (1) could possibly
> >> affect other platforms, and that seems safe enough.
> >>
> >> I'd like to commit and backpatch this, because otherwise longfin
> >> is going to start falling over when I upgrade its host to Mojave.
>
> > Looks good on this 10.13.4 system.  About to upgrade to 10.14...
>
> Thanks for testing!  I'll set to work on back-patching that.

... and now I'm on macOS 10.14.  I removed all traces of MacPorts from
my PATH and configure line to test this.  --with-tcl worked, but
--with-perl couldn't find "perl.h".  Then I realised that it was
because I was still on Xcode 9, so I was in for another ~5GB of
upgrading to get to Xcode 10.  After that, it all worked fine.


--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS as OpenSSL alternative