Hi,
On 2018-08-22 16:36:00 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I'm suspicious that we haven't had much feedback about this. We've
> heard of one or two cases where LLVM broke a query outright, and that
> was fixed and that was a good result. But we haven't heard anything
> about performance regressions. Surely there must be some. There hasn't
> been any discussion or further analysis of the default cost settings
> either. I feel that we don't have enough information.
Yea. I don't think we'll get really good feedback before production
unfortunately :(
> I would like, however, that we make a decision one way or the other
> before the next beta. I've been handwaving a bit to users not to rely
> on the current betas for performance testing because the defaults might
> change later. That's bad either way.
I don't see particularly much benefit in deciding before beta,
personally. What's making you think it'd be important to decide before?
Pretty fundamentally, it'll be a setting you don't know is effectively
on, for the forseeable future anyway?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
