Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

22 August 2018

• 00:03   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Chapman Flack
• 00:06   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andrew Dunstan
• 00:09   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Joshua D. Drake
• 00:10   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund
• 00:48   Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables Pavel Stehule
• 00:48   Re: Proposal: SLRU to Buffer Cache Shawn Debnath
• 02:49   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund
• 03:58   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andrew Dunstan
• 05:13   Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling Jerry Jelinek
• 05:29   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund
• 05:35   Re: Getting NOT NULL constraint from pg_attribute Wu Ivy
• 06:43   Re: Improve behavior of concurrent ANALYZE/VACUUM Michael Paquier
• 07:07   Re: Two proposed modifications to the PostgreSQL FDW Masahiko Sawada
• 08:17   Re: Improve behavior of concurrent ANALYZE/VACUUM Bossart, Nathan
• 10:20   Re: Two proposed modifications to the PostgreSQL FDW Chris Travers
• 10:54   RE: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization Yamaji, Ryo
• 11:36   Re: Improve behavior of concurrent ANALYZE/VACUUM Michael Paquier
• 11:45   plan_cache_mode and postgresql.conf.sample David Rowley
• 12:20   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12 Noah Misch
• 12:26   Re: plan_cache_mode and postgresql.conf.sample Thomas Munro
• 12:41   Re: plan_cache_mode and postgresql.conf.sample Michael Paquier
• 13:00   Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables Fabien COELHO
• 13:05   Re: Two proposed modifications to the PostgreSQL FDW Masahiko Sawada
• 13:08   Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables Amit Langote
• 14:13   Re: Two proposed modifications to the PostgreSQL FDW Chris Travers
• 14:15   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12 Andres Freund
• 14:35   Re: Proposal: SLRU to Buffer Cache Andrey Borodin
• 15:29   Re: Two proposed modifications to the PostgreSQL FDW Masahiko Sawada
• 16:28   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Amit Kapila
• 16:29   Re: Proposal: SLRU to Buffer Cache Andres Freund
• 17:08   Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled. Etsuro Fujita
• 17:44   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Sandeep Thakkar
• 17:47   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Sandeep Thakkar
• 18:02   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund
• 18:22   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Sandeep Thakkar
• 18:30   Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables David Rowley
• 18:33   Re: plan_cache_mode and postgresql.conf.sample David Rowley
• 19:15   Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs Peter Eisentraut
• 19:25   Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs Jonathan S. Katz
• 19:33   Re: Adding TCP_USER_TIMEOUT support for libpq/psqlodbc AYahorau@ibagroup.eu
• 20:06   Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling Alvaro Herrera
• 20:13   Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling Andres Freund
• 20:36   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12 Peter Eisentraut
• 20:41   Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling Alvaro Herrera
• 20:54   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12 Andres Freund
• 20:56   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Peter Eisentraut
• 21:01   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund
• 21:49   Re: Improve behavior of concurrent ANALYZE/VACUUM Bossart, Nathan
• 21:53   Sv: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12 Andreas Joseph Krogh
• 22:12   Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on Andres Freund
• 22:33   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12 Peter Eisentraut
• 22:36   Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on Jonathan S. Katz
• 22:39   Sv: Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on Andreas Joseph Krogh
• 22:39   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters Peter Eisentraut
• 22:49   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters David G. Johnston
• 22:51   Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on Andres Freund
• 22:56   Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) David Steele
• 22:58   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters Peter Eisentraut
• 23:21   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters Vladimir Sitnikov
• 23:51   Sv: Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on Andreas Joseph Krogh