Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Date
Msg-id 20170425145844.GN7513@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 01:10:35PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2017/04/25 10:31, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have committed the first draft of the Postgres 10 release notes.  They
> > are current as of two days ago, and I will keep them current.  Please
> > give me any feedback you have.
> > 
> > The only unusual thing is that this release has ~180 items while most
> > recent release have had ~220.  The pattern I see that there are more
> > large features in this release than previous ones.
> 
> Thanks for this.
> 
> Wondering if the following really belongs under postgres_fdw improvements:
> 
> +<listitem>
> +<!--
> +Author: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
> +2017-03-16 [b30fb56b0] postgres_fdw: Push down <literal>FULL JOIN</>s
> with restriction clau
> +-->
> +<para>
> +Improve optimization of <literal>FULL JOIN</> queries containing
> subqueries in the
> +<literal>FROM</> clause (Etsuro Fujita)
> +</para>
> +</listitem>
> 
> Maybe, nearby the following:
> 
> +   <sect3>
> +    <title>Additional Modules</title>
> ...
> +<listitem>
> +<!--
> +Author: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
> +2016-10-21 [7012b132d] postgres_fdw: Push down aggregates to remote servers.
> +-->
> +<para>
> +Push aggregates to foreign data wrapper servers, where possible (Jeevan
> +Chalke, Ashutosh Bapat)
> +</para>

Yes, you are right.  Text udpated and moved.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Link to commits in PG 10 release notes
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] an outdated comment for hash_seq_init.