Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses
Date
Msg-id 20150319171712.GH6061@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:33:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 03:42:20PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > > No.  And we don't know how to change the default opclass without
> > > breaking things, either.
> > 
> > Is there a page on the Wiki along the lines of "things that we would
> > like to change if ever there is a substantial change in on-disk format
> > that will break pg_upgrade"? ISTM that we should be intelligently
> > saving those some place, just as Redhat presumably save up
> > ABI-breakage over many years for the next major release of RHEL.
> > Alexander's complaint is a good example of such a change, IMV. Isn't
> > it more or less expected that the day will come when we'll make a
> > clean break?
> 
> It is on the TODO page under pg_upgrade:
> 
>     Desired changes that would prevent upgrades with pg_upgrade 

Item added to TODO list.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: flags argument for dsm_create
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL 9.4 mmap(2) performance regression on FreeBSD...