Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses
Date
Msg-id 20140929023333.GI12447@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 03:42:20PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > No.  And we don't know how to change the default opclass without
> > breaking things, either.
> 
> Is there a page on the Wiki along the lines of "things that we would
> like to change if ever there is a substantial change in on-disk format
> that will break pg_upgrade"? ISTM that we should be intelligently
> saving those some place, just as Redhat presumably save up
> ABI-breakage over many years for the next major release of RHEL.
> Alexander's complaint is a good example of such a change, IMV. Isn't
> it more or less expected that the day will come when we'll make a
> clean break?

It is on the TODO page under pg_upgrade:
Desired changes that would prevent upgrades with pg_upgrade 

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonb format is pessimal for toast compression