Re: logical changeset generation v6.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: logical changeset generation v6.2
Date
Msg-id 20131003163859.GF19661@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logical changeset generation v6.2  (Steve Singer <steve@ssinger.info>)
Responses Re: logical changeset generation v6.2  (Steve Singer <steve@ssinger.info>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-10-01 16:11:47 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
> On 09/30/2013 06:44 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >The series from friday was a bit too buggy - obviously I was too
> >tired. So here's a new one:
> 
> With this series I've also noticed
> #2  0x00000000007741a7 in ExceptionalCondition (
>     conditionName=conditionName@entry=0x7c2908 "!(!(tuple->t_infomask &
> 0x1000))", errorType=errorType@entry=0x7acc70 "FailedAssertion",
>     fileName=fileName@entry=0x91767e "tqual.c",
>     lineNumber=lineNumber@entry=1608) at assert.c:54
> 54        abort();
> 
> 
>  0x00000000007a4432 in HeapTupleSatisfiesMVCCDuringDecoding (
>     htup=0x10bfe48, snapshot=0x108b3d8, buffer=310) at tqual.c:1608
> #4  0x000000000049d6b7 in heap_hot_search_buffer (tid=tid@entry=0x10bfe4c,
>     relation=0x7fbebbcd89c0, buffer=310, snapshot=0x10bfda0,
>     heapTuple=heapTuple@entry=0x10bfe48,
>     all_dead=all_dead@entry=0x7fff4aa3866f "\001\370\375\v\001",
>     first_call=1 '\001') at heapam.c:1756
> #5  0x00000000004a8174 in index_fetch_heap (scan=scan@entry=0x10bfdf8)
>     at indexam.c:539
> #6  0x00000000004a82a8 in index_getnext (scan=0x10bfdf8,
>     direction=direction@entry=ForwardScanDirection) at indexam.c:622
> #7  0x00000000004a6fa9 in systable_getnext (sysscan=sysscan@entry=0x10bfd48)
>     at genam.c:343
> #8  0x000000000076df40 in RelidByRelfilenode (reltablespace=0,
>     relfilenode=529775) at relfilenodemap.c:214
> ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
> #9  0x0000000000664ad7 in ReorderBufferCommit (rb=0x1082d98,
>     xid=<optimized out>, commit_lsn=4638756800, end_lsn=<optimized out>,
>     commit_time=commit_time@entry=433970378426176) at reorderbuffer.c:1320

Does your code use SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE on system or treat_as_catalog
tables?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: record identical operator - Review
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql.print_strict_params