Steve,
Thanks for following-up on this; I had meant to reply much sooner but
other things got in the way.
Thanks again,
Stephen
* Steve Singer (steve@ssinger.info) wrote:
> Are there any outstanding issues on this patch preventing it from
> being committed?
> I think we have discussed this patch enough such that we now have
> consensus on proceeding with adding a record identical operator to
> SQL.
> No one has objected to the latest names of the operators.
>
> You haven't adjusted the patch to reduce the duplication between the
> equality and comparison functions, if you disagree with me and feel
> that doing so would increase the code complexity and be inconsistent
> with how we do things elsewhere that is fine.
