Re: C++ compiler - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: C++ compiler
Date
Msg-id 20130625024442.GE14698@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C++ compiler  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:38:48PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
> On 06/24/2013 05:37 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> >On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:21:26PM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>I think the big question is whether you can _control_ what C++ features
> >>>>are used, or whether you are perpetually instructing users what C++
> >>>>features not to use.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>How is that different than us having to do the same with C?
> >>
> >>
> >>Perhaps the size of C++ ?
> >
> >Right. I don't think there are any C features we want to avoid;  are
> >there any?
> 
> Anything supported by C99 and not other versions I would say.
> However, my point is if done correctly we would state which features
> ahead of time we are willing to use and make them part of the
> developer faq?

Yes, that would be the best approach.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: C++ compiler