Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqF87EZjk+SJWC6-w298mHyLFCY1e1eHSN26zKu-N8wZig@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup  (Sawada Masahiko <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

> parameter improvement idea is which we extend ini file for to set
> parameter each standby. For example :
>
> --------------------
> [Server]
> standby_name = 'slave1'
> synchronous_transfer = commit
> wal_sender_timeout = 30
> [Server]
> standby_name = 'slave2'
> synchronous_transfer = all
> wal_sender_timeout = 50
> -------------------
>

Just ask to clarify:

Is 'slave2' a failback standby?
What does 'synchronous_transfer = all' mean? Does that mean wait
during both commit and checkpoint?



--
Amit Langote



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: C++ compiler
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: C++ compiler