Re: C++ compiler - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: C++ compiler
Date
Msg-id 51C8F4A8.5060503@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C++ compiler  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: C++ compiler  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: C++ compiler  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 06/24/2013 05:37 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:21:26PM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think the big question is whether you can _control_ what C++ features
>>>> are used, or whether you are perpetually instructing users what C++
>>>> features not to use.
>>>
>>>
>>> How is that different than us having to do the same with C?
>>
>>
>> Perhaps the size of C++ ?
>
> Right. I don't think there are any C features we want to avoid;  are
> there any?

Anything supported by C99 and not other versions I would say. However, 
my point is if done correctly we would state which features ahead of 
time we are willing to use and make them part of the developer faq?


Sincerely,

JD


>


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms   a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible bug in CASE evaluation
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List