On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:22:20AM +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> >> > UPDATE ... RETURNING OLD
> > There are several more DML operations with odd inability to return
> > rows, but UPDATE's the one that really stands out, and is a bite-sized
> > chunk in the sense of having a relatively small scope of design and
> > not touching parts of the system unless they use the new grammar.
>
> Which makes me think about having OLD and NEW "relations" available in
> per statement triggers, too. Would that be a SoC sized projects? Maybe
> if the relation is simply a SRF…
Are you envisioning this as a common infrastructure to both?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
