David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:22:20AM +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
>> >> > UPDATE ... RETURNING OLD
>> > There are several more DML operations with odd inability to return
>> > rows, but UPDATE's the one that really stands out, and is a bite-sized
>> > chunk in the sense of having a relatively small scope of design and
>> > not touching parts of the system unless they use the new grammar.
>>
>> Which makes me think about having OLD and NEW "relations" available in
>> per statement triggers, too. Would that be a SoC sized projects? Maybe
>> if the relation is simply a SRF…
>
> Are you envisioning this as a common infrastructure to both?
I don't think so. Would happily be proven wrong, though :)
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
