Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows
Date
Msg-id 20120904134749.GA19036@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep  3, 2012 at 12:44:09PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> The attached very small patch allows pg_upgrade's "make check" to
> succeed on REL9_2_STABLE on my Mingw system.
> 
> However, I consider the issue I mentioned earlier regarding use of
> forward slashes in the argument to rmdir to be a significant
> blocker, so I'm going to go and fix that and then pull this all
> together.
> 
> cheers
> 
> andrew

> diff --git a/contrib/pg_upgrade/exec.c b/contrib/pg_upgrade/exec.c
> index 6f993df..57ca1df 100644
> --- a/contrib/pg_upgrade/exec.c
> +++ b/contrib/pg_upgrade/exec.c
> @@ -91,10 +91,12 @@ exec_prog(bool throw_error, bool is_priv, const char *log_file,
>      else
>          retval = 0;
>  
> +#ifndef WIN32
>      if ((log = fopen_priv(log_file, "a+")) == NULL)
>          pg_log(PG_FATAL, "cannot write to log file %s\n", log_file);
>      fprintf(log, "\n\n");
>      fclose(log);
> +#endif
>  
>      return retval;
>  }

I am confused by this fix.  If pg_ctl was keeping that log file open,
wouldn't the log write fail when pg_dump or psql was run later?  I am
trying to understand how a later commands would not also trigger an
error.  Is it a timing thing?  If that is it, I would like to know and
have that documented.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode