Re: pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode
Date
Msg-id CABUevExE2j1agkY+e0aT1-Y3my6dXBayEmeJ7AWbQ1+c+HTycA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>> On Aug 28, 2012 9:59 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>>> Well, why don't we just s/restoring/processing/ in the debug message,
>>>> and call it good?
>
>> Are we "allowed" to backpatch things to 9.2 at this point that changes
>> strings for translators?
>
> Well, not being a translator I'm not sure that I get a vote.
> But I'd think this is too minor to justify back-patching it.

Probably - that's why I didn't even consider going back beyond 9.2.

Anyway; I'll just leave it at master.


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode