Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 6/11/2011 1:02 AM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Jim Nasby<jim@nasby.net> wrote:
> >> It's damn annoying... enough so that I'd personally be in favor of creating a pid column that has the same data so
wecan deprecate
> >> procpid and eventually remove it...
> > well, if we will start changing bad picked names we will have a *lot*
> > of work to do... starting by the project's name ;)
>
> There is a difference between a project name and something that directly
> affects usability. +1 on fixing this. IMO, we don't create a new pid
> column, we just fix the problem. If we do it for 9.2, we have 18 months
> to communicate the change.
Uh, I am the first one I remember complaining about this so I don't see
why we should break compatibility for such a low-level problem.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
