Re: procpid? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: procpid?
Date
Msg-id 4DF4131D.5020003@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: procpid?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: procpid?
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/11/2011 1:23 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> There is a difference between a project name and something that directly
>> affects usability. +1 on fixing this. IMO, we don't create a new pid
>> column, we just fix the problem. If we do it for 9.2, we have 18 months
>> to communicate the change.
> Uh, I am the first one I remember complaining about this so I don't see
> why we should break compatibility for such a low-level problem.
>

Because it is a very real problem with an easy fix. We have 18 months to 
publicize that fix. I mean really? This is a no-brainer.

JD



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: wrong message on REASSIGN OWNED
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq SSL with non-blocking sockets