Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar may 24 15:59:59 -0400 2011:
>
> > > I think you misread what I wrote, or I misexplained it, but never
> > > mind. Matching locale names case-insensitively sounds reasonable to
> > > me, unless someone has reason to believe it will blow up.
> >
> > OK, that's what I needed to hear. I have applied the attached patch,
> > but only to 9.1 because of the risk of breakage. (This was only the
> > first bug report of this, and we aren't 100% certain about the case
> > issue.)
>
> Hmm, I know the locale can be spelled "en_US.UTF-8" (note dash) in some
> systems. So if you have a locale alias that makes en_US.utf8 the same
> as en_US.UTF-8, the patched code would still not work. I wonder if
> there's a need for canonicalization somewhere. Or maybe this is just
> not worth the trouble.
I can easily remove dashes before the compare if people like that idea
--- I think you could argue that a dash is not significant, unless "ab-c"
and "a-bc" are different locales.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
