Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > Should we add (or replace) CP949 for EUC-KR?
>
> No. CP949 is not plain EUC-KR, but EUC-KR with some extensions (UHC). At
> least on CVS HEAD, we recognize CP949 as an alias for the PostgreSQL
> PG_UHC encoding.
That's it! We should have added an additional alias to chklocale, too.
Index: src/port/chklocale.c
===================================================================
--- src/port/chklocale.c (HEAD)
+++ src/port/chklocale.c (fixed)
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ {PG_GBK, "CP936"}, {PG_UHC, "UHC"},
+ {PG_UHC, "CP949"}, {PG_JOHAB, "JOHAB"}, {PG_JOHAB, "CP1361"},
Except UHC, we don't have any codepage aliases for the encodings below.
I assume we don't need to add CPxxx because Windows does not have
corresponding codepages for them, right?
{PG_LATIN6, "ISO-8859-10"}, {PG_LATIN7, "ISO-8859-13"}, {PG_LATIN8, "ISO-8859-14"}, {PG_LATIN10,
"ISO-8859-16"}, {PG_SHIFT_JIS_2004, "SJIS_2004"},
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
