Re: CP949 for EUC-KR? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: CP949 for EUC-KR?
Date
Msg-id 4BD73DB0.6090307@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CP949 for EUC-KR?  (Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
> That's it! We should have added an additional alias to chklocale, too.
> 
> Index: src/port/chklocale.c
> ===================================================================
> --- src/port/chklocale.c    (HEAD)
> +++ src/port/chklocale.c    (fixed)
> @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@
>      {PG_GBK, "CP936"},
>  
>      {PG_UHC, "UHC"},
> +    {PG_UHC, "CP949"},
>  
>      {PG_JOHAB, "JOHAB"},
>      {PG_JOHAB, "CP1361"},

Yeah, seems correct.

> Except UHC, we don't have any codepage aliases for the encodings below.
> I assume we don't need to add CPxxx because Windows does not have
> corresponding codepages for them, right?
> 
>     {PG_LATIN6, "ISO-8859-10"},
>     {PG_LATIN7, "ISO-8859-13"},
>     {PG_LATIN8, "ISO-8859-14"},
>     {PG_LATIN10, "ISO-8859-16"},
>     {PG_SHIFT_JIS_2004, "SJIS_2004"},

Yeah, I guess so. I can't find Windows codepages for these either, by
google.

--  Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance