Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts
Date
Msg-id 20090825194807.GK12604@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts
List pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner wrote:

> The reason is that we don't want certain other processes attempting to
> start until and unless the database they use has started successfully.

This is something we're not quite ready on, yet.  We need some mechanism
that allows scripts to verify not only that postmaster started, but also
that it has finished recovery.  You can sort-of do it by attempting a
connection and checking the error message, but it's ugly.  There was
talk about a pg_ping utility years ago, but nobody got around to writing
it ...

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts
Next
From: Chander Ganesan
Date:
Subject: Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts