Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> And we get into the whole question of error handling, which is what
> >> shot down that proposal last time.
>
> > Can you remind me of the details? I don't remember that issue.
> > Currently PQinitSSL() returns void, so I don't see an issue there.
>
> The point is exactly the same as the complaint about turning PQinitSSL's
> argument into a bitmask: if you are trying to define an extensible API
> then you need a way for the app to determine whether all the bits it
> passed were recognizable by the library.
It seems having the init function return the bits it recognized would be
the logical return value.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
