Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Chernow
Subject Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Date
Msg-id 49D10F6B.1030802@esilo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> I think we should stick with the simple two-argument function and not

+1000000

Generic PQinit concept was already punted several times.  Using a bit 
mask for initsecure or something was also tried and rejected.  The well 
is dry on this.

-- 
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf