Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > OTOH we may be talking at cross-purposes --- on looking into gram.y
> > I see that this syntax is transformed to a call of convert_using(),
> > which may mean it has nothing to do with your changes.
> >
> >
> >
>
> No, I changed convert_using -
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/catalog/pg_conversion.c?r1=1.36&r2=1.37
>
> We can revert that if necessary. It will open up a hole, though. Take
> your pick - spec compliance or validly coded data.
Is this a TODO?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +