Tom Lane wrote:
> OTOH we may be talking at cross-purposes --- on looking into gram.y
> I see that this syntax is transformed to a call of convert_using(),
> which may mean it has nothing to do with your changes.
>
>
>
No, I changed convert_using -
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/catalog/pg_conversion.c?r1=1.36&r2=1.37
We can revert that if necessary. It will open up a hole, though. Take
your pick - spec compliance or validly coded data.
cheers
andrew
