Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Derek Rodner wrote:
> > In presentations, articles, blogs, etc. Any publicly visible spot.
>
> This is assuming the name of the project has changed. It hasn't. The
> name of this project is PostgreSQL.
But without such changes the alias is only in the FAQ and will not be
widely used.
> This whole thread stinks of... I couldn't get my way and change the name
> outright so instead I will subvert my will through alternative means...
Well, actually, I see it the opposite where you brow-beat folks until
you think they will quit. (I am not a quitter, which I think you know.)
And I certainly do think the name change will finally be made, so I
don't feel like I have to subvert anything.
I thought it would not be a controversial change because I already
stated I wanted to make the alias more visible and no one objected. Now
I have a few objections and a lot of people who think it is a good idea.
Frankly, if the alias takes hold we might not need to make the full name
change -- supressing this idea now might actually hasten the name
change.
> Bruce, with respect. Let's start with one thing at a time. We have
> changed the FAQ.
I see no reason we can't move forward with more. I certainly have the
minimal time it would take to make simplistic changes:
grep -A5 PostgreSQL *.sgml
shows me pretty much the places that need updating --- about 15 minutes.
> The community "just" accepted the FAQ change, and now you want to start
> this?
>
> Let it lay.
Again, why shut down the discussion?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
