Re: Using Postgres as an alias - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Using Postgres as an alias
Date
Msg-id 46FAA680.3030801@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using Postgres as an alias  ("Derek Rodner" <derek.rodner@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Using Postgres as an alias  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Using Postgres as an alias  (Adrian Klaver <aklaver@comcast.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Derek Rodner wrote:
> In presentations, articles, blogs, etc. Any publicly visible spot.

This is assuming the name of the project has changed. It hasn't. The
name of this project is PostgreSQL.

This whole thread stinks of... I couldn't get my way and change the name
outright so instead I will subvert my will through alternative means...

Bruce, with respect. Let's start with one thing at a time. We have
changed the FAQ.

The community "just" accepted the FAQ change, and now you want to start
this?

Let it lay.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Derek M. Rodner
> Director, Product Strategy
> EnterpriseDB Corporation
> 732-331-1333 office
> 484-252-1943 cell
> www.enterprisedb.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org <pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org>
> To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
> Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Wed Sep 26 14:23:50 2007
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Using Postgres as an alias
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> In an attempt to get "Postgres" more widely used, I propose changing
>>> "PostgreSQL" to "Postgres" in the documentation when there is more
>>> than one mention of "PostgreSQL" in the same paragraph.
>> I don't see why the documentation readers should be the first victims of
>> our differences about product naming.  Technical documentation is the
>> last place where you want to be ambiguous and inconsistent.  If you
>> want to introduce useless randomness, please start somewhere else.
>
> If we agree we should mention our alias "Postgres" more, where do you
> propose we do that?  I suggested the documentation and FAQ.  Do you have
> a better idea?
>


- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
            UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG+qaAATb/zqfZUUQRAsD4AKCJZRTD9qds3h4DdiFmh2J6OYNCdQCfRdjU
DNiFvo+Xb/J95wr6hIl3TA4=
=kL3y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Derek Rodner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Using Postgres as an alias
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Using Postgres as an alias