Re: Using Postgres as an alias - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Date | |
Msg-id | 46FAA680.3030801@commandprompt.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Using Postgres as an alias ("Derek Rodner" <derek.rodner@enterprisedb.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Using Postgres as an alias
(Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Using Postgres as an alias (Adrian Klaver <aklaver@comcast.net>) |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Derek Rodner wrote: > In presentations, articles, blogs, etc. Any publicly visible spot. This is assuming the name of the project has changed. It hasn't. The name of this project is PostgreSQL. This whole thread stinks of... I couldn't get my way and change the name outright so instead I will subvert my will through alternative means... Bruce, with respect. Let's start with one thing at a time. We have changed the FAQ. The community "just" accepted the FAQ change, and now you want to start this? Let it lay. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Derek M. Rodner > Director, Product Strategy > EnterpriseDB Corporation > 732-331-1333 office > 484-252-1943 cell > www.enterprisedb.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org <pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org> > To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> > Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org> > Sent: Wed Sep 26 14:23:50 2007 > Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Using Postgres as an alias > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> In an attempt to get "Postgres" more widely used, I propose changing >>> "PostgreSQL" to "Postgres" in the documentation when there is more >>> than one mention of "PostgreSQL" in the same paragraph. >> I don't see why the documentation readers should be the first victims of >> our differences about product naming. Technical documentation is the >> last place where you want to be ambiguous and inconsistent. If you >> want to introduce useless randomness, please start somewhere else. > > If we agree we should mention our alias "Postgres" more, where do you > propose we do that? I suggested the documentation and FAQ. Do you have > a better idea? > - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG+qaAATb/zqfZUUQRAsD4AKCJZRTD9qds3h4DdiFmh2J6OYNCdQCfRdjU DNiFvo+Xb/J95wr6hIl3TA4= =kL3y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgsql-advocacy by date: