Re: Not-so-open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Not-so-open items
Date
Msg-id 200609142032.k8EKWYR29964@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Not-so-open items  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Not-so-open items  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> There are several entries on the 8.2 open-items list that I think can be
> removed:
> 
>     Fix backward array comparison - subset
> 
> Done (this was redundant with the containment-operator item)

OK, that wasn't clear to me.

>     Store only active XIDs in subtransaction cache
> 
> Per my note just now, this probably should wait for 8.3.

OK, added to TODO.

>     Double vacuum speed on tables with no indexes
> 
> I changed the locking thing I was worried about.  Unless Greg wants to
> do some real-world performance measurements to confirm or refute that
> change, I think this can be closed.

OK, removed.

> 
>     Fix excessive page checking for new btree split code
> 
> Per my note yesterday, I can't reproduce the misbehavior I saw six weeks
> ago, so I recommend we leave the code alone.

OK, removed.

>     Suppress error on bind parameters of unknown types
> 
> I haven't heard one single person speak up to say "yeah, that's a good
> idea", so I conclude it probably isn't.  Recommend we not change it.

OK, removed.

> BTW, pushing out an 8.1.5 is probably a good idea, but what's it doing
> in the 8.2 open-items list?  Especially in the "documentation" section?

It is something that has to happen before final release, but is not a
_code_ item, so I threw it there.

--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Release notes
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Draft release notes