Re: Re-thing PG_MODULE_MAGIC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re-thing PG_MODULE_MAGIC
Date
Msg-id 200606160401.k5G41rW18236@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re-thing PG_MODULE_MAGIC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re-thing PG_MODULE_MAGIC  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: Re-thing PG_MODULE_MAGIC  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>> The <quote>magic block</> present in all PostgreSQL-supported libraries
> >>> is checked to guarantee compatibility.  For this reason, non-PostgreSQL
> >>> libraries cannot be loaded in this way.
> >> 
> >> you need "must be" before "present".  
> 
> > Uh, the point is not that they need a magic block (though they do), but
> > rather that the magic block is always checked.
> 
> It's a grammar complaint, not a factual complaint.  Personally I'd
> suggest wording it as "the magic block required in all ..."

OK, new text:
The <quote>magic block</> required in all PostgreSQL-supported librariesis checked to guarantee compatibility.  For
thisreason, non-PostgreSQLlibraries cannot be loaded in this way.
 

--  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement
Next
From: mark@mark.mielke.cc
Date:
Subject: Re: Preventing DELETE and UPDATE without a WHERE clause?