From: Steinar H. Gunderson
Subject: Re: Réf
Date: ,
Msg-id: 20050406174254.GC13641@uio.no
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: Réf. : Re: RE : RE: Postgresql  (Rod Taylor)
Responses: Re: Réf  (Rod Taylor)
List: pgsql-performance

Tree view

Réf. : Re: RE : RE: Postgresql vsSQLserver for this  (, )
 Re: Réf. : Re: RE : RE: Postgresql  (Rod Taylor, )
  Re: Réf  ("Steinar H. Gunderson", )
   Re: Réf  (Rod Taylor, )
    Re: Réf  (Alex Turner, )
     Re: Réf  (Rod Taylor, )

On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:18:29PM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote:
> Yeah, I think that can be done provided there is more than one worker.
> My limit seems to be about 1000 transactions per second each with a
> single insert for a single process (round trip time down the Fibre
> Channel is large) but running 4 simultaneously only drops throughput to
> about 900 per process (total of 2400 transactions per second) and the
> machine still seemed to have lots of oomph to spare.

Erm, have I missed something here? 900 * 4 = 2400?

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/


pgsql-performance by date:

From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Tweaking a C Function I wrote
From: Alex Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: How to improve db performance with $7K?