From: Rod Taylor
Subject: Re: Réf
Date: ,
Msg-id: 1112811790.92363.123.camel@home
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: Réf  ("Steinar H. Gunderson")
Responses: Re: Réf  (Alex Turner)
List: pgsql-performance

Tree view

Réf. : Re: RE : RE: Postgresql vsSQLserver for this  (, )
 Re: Réf. : Re: RE : RE: Postgresql  (Rod Taylor, )
  Re: Réf  ("Steinar H. Gunderson", )
   Re: Réf  (Rod Taylor, )
    Re: Réf  (Alex Turner, )
     Re: Réf  (Rod Taylor, )

On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 19:42 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:18:29PM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > Yeah, I think that can be done provided there is more than one worker.
> > My limit seems to be about 1000 transactions per second each with a
> > single insert for a single process (round trip time down the Fibre
> > Channel is large) but running 4 simultaneously only drops throughput to
> > about 900 per process (total of 2400 transactions per second) and the
> > machine still seemed to have lots of oomph to spare.
>
> Erm, have I missed something here? 900 * 4 = 2400?

Nope. You've not missed anything.

If I ran 10 processes and the requirement would be met.
--



pgsql-performance by date:

From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Tweaking a C Function I wrote
From: Alex Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: How to improve db performance with $7K?