Re: Réf - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: Réf
Date
Msg-id 1112811790.92363.123.camel@home
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Réf  ("Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>)
Responses Re: Réf
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 19:42 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:18:29PM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > Yeah, I think that can be done provided there is more than one worker.
> > My limit seems to be about 1000 transactions per second each with a
> > single insert for a single process (round trip time down the Fibre
> > Channel is large) but running 4 simultaneously only drops throughput to
> > about 900 per process (total of 2400 transactions per second) and the
> > machine still seemed to have lots of oomph to spare.
>
> Erm, have I missed something here? 900 * 4 = 2400?

Nope. You've not missed anything.

If I ran 10 processes and the requirement would be met.
--


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alex Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: RE : RE: Postgresql vs SQLserver for thisapplication ?
Next
From: Mischa
Date:
Subject: Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient