Tom Lane wrote:
> PLs are sufficiently tightly tied to the core that it's probably
> easier to maintain them as part of our core CVS than otherwise.
> (Ask Joe Conway about PL/R.
As a matter of fact, let's ask him.
> Thomas Hallgren is probably not that
> happy about maintaining pl/java out of core, either.
And let's ask him, too.
I'm not convinced that PLs are more tied to the core than say OpenFTS,
and if we can't maintain that kind of thing externally, then this whole
extension thing sounds like a failure to me.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
