Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?  (Tom Lane)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?  (Tom Lane)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?  ("Marc G. Fournier")
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> PLs are sufficiently tightly tied to the core that it's probably
> easier to maintain them as part of our core CVS than otherwise.
> (Ask Joe Conway about PL/R.

As a matter of fact, let's ask him.

> Thomas Hallgren is probably not that
> happy about maintaining pl/java out of core, either.

And let's ask him, too.

I'm not convinced that PLs are more tied to the core than say OpenFTS,
and if we can't maintain that kind of thing externally, then this whole
extension thing sounds like a failure to me.

Peter Eisentraut

pgsql-general by date:

From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
From: Greg Stark
Subject: Re: Debugging deadlocks