Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date
Msg-id 20050402021121.D18194@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I'm not convinced that PLs are more tied to the core than say OpenFTS,
> and if we can't maintain that kind of thing externally, then this whole
> extension thing sounds like a failure to me.

As many times as Peter and I butt heads, on this I have to agree ... we're
an "extensible database that requires the extensions to be in core" is
effectively what is being said, which kinda defeats the 'extensible'
nature ...


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?