Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database
Date
Msg-id 200210121511.g9CFBs619940@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database  (Chris Miles <chris_pg002@psychofx.com>)
Responses Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database
Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database
List pgsql-admin
Chris Miles wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:09:55AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We also don't recommend NFS directories because the NFS file behavior is
> > not 100% the same as a local file system.
>
> Can you comment on what the incompatabities are?  (related to PostgreSQL
> only).
>
> We currently run PostgreSQL on Linux servers with the data on dedicated
> Netapp filers over NFS.  We have had no problems so far and performance
> is very acceptable.
>
> If there is something I need to watch out for, I would like to know.

Good question.  It is my understanding that fsync, locking, and the
order of writes is not guaranteed in NFS like it is for local file
systems.  I question how well it would handle any of the failure modes
that local file systems can withstand.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Chris Miles
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database
Next
From: Chris Miles
Date:
Subject: Replicating MSSQL to PostgreSQL possible?