Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Chris Miles
Subject Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database
Date
Msg-id 20021012161939.K6712@psychofx.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database  ("Chad R. Larson" <chad@eldocomp.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 11:11:53AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Good question.  It is my understanding that fsync, locking, and the
> order of writes is not guaranteed in NFS like it is for local file
> systems.  I question how well it would handle any of the failure modes
> that local file systems can withstand.

Good point.  Perhaps that depends on the NFS client and server combination
also?  I know that Netapp worked with Oracle and both companies guarantee
and recommend a Sun/Netapp Oracle over NFS solution (which I have setup
in a previous life) and such a solution works very well.

Nobody is going to make such a guarantee with postgresql (are they?)
so consider us a case study for such a setup.  So far, so good, even
under heavy load testing.

If anybody has any horror stories with postgresql over NFS, please share
them.

Cheers,
Chris.


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Chris Miles
Date:
Subject: Replicating MSSQL to PostgreSQL possible?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database