Dave Page wrote:
> Which in this case is what puzzles me. We are only talking about a
> simple GUC variable after all - I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing
> it's not a huge effort to add one?
Can we get agreement on that? A GUC for pg_xlog location? Much cleaner
than -X, doesn't have the problems of possible accidental use, and does
allow pg_xlog moving without symlinks, which some people don't like?
If I can get a few 'yes' votes I will add it to TODO and do it for 7.4.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
