Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date
Msg-id 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8681F@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:chriskl@familyhealth.com.au]
> Sent: 17 September 2002 09:49
> To: shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in; Pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Cc: Pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
>
>
> Users HAVE provided their feedback - they want Postgres on
> Windows.  What's the point of open source if we can't
> accomodate them?  There's no problems with economics,
> marketing, schedules, deadlines, nothing.  The reason that
> people like Open Source is because they don't have to deal
> with some monolithic company refusing to port to their
> platform just because it's "too hard".

Which in this case is what puzzles me. We are only talking about a
simple GUC variable after all - I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing
it's not a huge effort to add one?

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Next
From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD"
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues