Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date
Msg-id 20020811173841.N67113-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > NAMEDATALEN will be 64 or 128 in 7.3.  At this point, we better decide
> > which one we prefer.
> >
> > The conservative approach would be to go for 64 and perhaps increase it
> > again in 7.4 after we get feedback and real-world usage.  If we go to
> > 128, we will have trouble decreasing it if there are performance
> > problems.
>
> I guess I'd also agree with:
>    FUNC_MAX_ARGS 32
>    NAMEDATALEN 64
> and work on the performance issues for 7.4.

I agree too.

Chris




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: python patch