Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date
Msg-id 200208131816.g7DIGnw15009@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
I am working on a patch to increase these as agreed.  I found this
interesting, from the 6.3 release notes:
  Increase 16 char limit on system table/index names to 32 characters(Bruce)

The limited to be 16 chars until 6.3 in 1998-03-01.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > NAMEDATALEN will be 64 or 128 in 7.3.  At this point, we better decide
> > > which one we prefer.
> > >
> > > The conservative approach would be to go for 64 and perhaps increase it
> > > again in 7.4 after we get feedback and real-world usage.  If we go to
> > > 128, we will have trouble decreasing it if there are performance
> > > problems.
> >
> > I guess I'd also agree with:
> >    FUNC_MAX_ARGS 32
> >    NAMEDATALEN 64
> > and work on the performance issues for 7.4.
> 
> I agree too.
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Copeland
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS
Next
From: strange@nsk.yi.org
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS