Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date
Msg-id 3D55BBE5.9050605@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, seems we have not come to a decision yet on this.
> 
> Do we have agreement to increate FUNC_MAX_ARGS to 32?
> 
> NAMEDATALEN will be 64 or 128 in 7.3.  At this point, we better decide
> which one we prefer.
> 
> The conservative approach would be to go for 64 and perhaps increase it
> again in 7.4 after we get feedback and real-world usage.  If we go to
> 128, we will have trouble decreasing it if there are performance
> problems.

I guess I'd also agree with:  FUNC_MAX_ARGS 32  NAMEDATALEN 64
and work on the performance issues for 7.4.

Joe






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items