Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution in - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution in |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200206251641.g5PGfFm24460@candle.pha.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution in the Debian way (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > > Frankly, my feeling is, as a "geek-to-geek" product, PostgreSQL is already > > adequately marketed through our huge network of DBA users and code > > contributors. > > Well, mumble ... it seems to me that we are definitely suffering from > a "buzz gap" (cf missile gap, Dr Strangelove, etc) compared to MySQL. > That doesn't bother me in itself, but the long-term implications are > scary. If MySQL manages to attract a larger development community as > a consequence of more usage or better marketing, then eventually they > will be ahead of us on features and every other measure that counts. > Once we're number two with no prayer of catching up, how long will our > project remain viable? So, no matter how silly you might think > "MySQL is better" is today, you've got to consider the prospect that > it will become a self-fulfilling prophecy. > > So far I have not worried about that scenario too much, because Monty > has always treated the MySQL sources as his personal preserve; if he > hadn't written it or closely reviewed it, it didn't get in, and if it > didn't hew closely to his opinion of what's important, it didn't get in. > But I get the impression that he's loosened up of late. If MySQL stops > being limited by what one guy can do or review, their rate of progress > could improve dramatically. > > In short: we could use an organized marketing effort. I really > feel the lack of Great Bridge these days; there isn't anyone with > comparable willingness to expend marketing talent and dollars on > promoting Postgres as such. Not sure what to do about it. We've > sort of dismissed Jean-Michel's comments (and those of others in > the past) with "sure, step right up and do the marketing" responses. > But the truth of the matter is that a few amateurs with no budget > won't make much of an impression. We really need some professionals > with actual dollars to spend, and I don't know where to find 'em. OK, let me make some comments on this. First, Great Bridge had me doing some marketing stuff while I was with them. This included trade shows, magazine articles, and interviews. I am available to do all those again. GB lined up the contacts and got it all started. If people want me to do more of that, I can find the time. I am not sure how effective that was. There was a lot more marketing done by Great Bridge that would take lots of money to do. Do people want an advocacy article written, like "How to choose a database?" I could do that. Basically, I am open to ideas. Would it help to fly me out to meet IT leaders? More books/articles? What does it take? What do successful companies and open source projects do that works? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
pgsql-hackers by date: