Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution in the Debian way - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution in the Debian way |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4880.1024982466@sss.pgh.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution in the Debian way (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution
Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution in Re: Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution in |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > Frankly, my feeling is, as a "geek-to-geek" product, PostgreSQL is already > adequately marketed through our huge network of DBA users and code > contributors. Well, mumble ... it seems to me that we are definitely suffering from a "buzz gap" (cf missile gap, Dr Strangelove, etc) compared to MySQL. That doesn't bother me in itself, but the long-term implications are scary. If MySQL manages to attract a larger development community as a consequence of more usage or better marketing, then eventually they will be ahead of us on features and every other measure that counts. Once we're number two with no prayer of catching up, how long will our project remain viable? So, no matter how silly you might think "MySQL is better" is today, you've got to consider the prospect that it will become a self-fulfilling prophecy. So far I have not worried about that scenario too much, because Monty has always treated the MySQL sources as his personal preserve; if he hadn't written it or closely reviewed it, it didn't get in, and if it didn't hew closely to his opinion of what's important, it didn't get in. But I get the impression that he's loosened up of late. If MySQL stops being limited by what one guy can do or review, their rate of progress could improve dramatically. In short: we could use an organized marketing effort. I really feel the lack of Great Bridge these days; there isn't anyone with comparable willingness to expend marketing talent and dollars on promoting Postgres as such. Not sure what to do about it. We've sort of dismissed Jean-Michel's comments (and those of others in the past) with "sure, step right up and do the marketing" responses. But the truth of the matter is that a few amateurs with no budget won't make much of an impression. We really need some professionals with actual dollars to spend, and I don't know where to find 'em. regards, tom lane
pgsql-hackers by date: