Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ross J. Reedstrom
Subject Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL
Date
Msg-id 20020322190037.GA15540@rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL  (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:12:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Also I agree with Fernando that trying to make the word COLUMN optional
> is likely to lead to conflicts.

According to the docs, COLUMN is _already_ optional at that point.
Are the changes past that point going to cause different problems? Boy,
parsers make my brain hurt.

BTW, is NULLABLE so ugly that no one wanted to comment on it? It _is_
an sql92 reserved keyword, and it's actual english grammar.

Ross

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Use of PG_BINARY_R and "r"
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of PG_BINARY_R and "r"