Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date
Msg-id 200108151923.f7FJNkI15407@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
List pgsql-patches
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Attached please find:
> >
> >     the original proposal to encrypt pg_shadow
> >     a diff of the current CVS
> >     two new files (backend/libpq/md5.c and include/libpq/md5.h)
> >         which implement MD5 encryption (from Vince with cleanups)
>
> I also see that the md5.c implementation does not use palloc and makes the
> rather odd assumption that long int == unsigned64.

That is from Vince's code, I think.  Can you suggest a fix?

> What's your rush?  Is there a deadline now?

I want to do SCM patch, then write presentation for LinuxWorld, and go
to Linuxworld. Then we are at the end of August.  Also, people need to
do the Java MD5 code, and if I want that before we start 7.2 beta, I
feel rushed.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords