Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0108152114100.677-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian writes:

> Attached please find:
>
>     the original proposal to encrypt pg_shadow
>     a diff of the current CVS
>     two new files (backend/libpq/md5.c and include/libpq/md5.h)
>         which implement MD5 encryption (from Vince with cleanups)

I also see that the md5.c implementation does not use palloc and makes the
rather odd assumption that long int == unsigned64.

What's your rush?  Is there a deadline now?

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords