> On 2 Nov 2018, at 15:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> I wrote:
>> Here's a lightly-tested patch for that approach.
>
> Anybody have an opinion about which approach to use? We need to choose
> one, and PDQ too, if we want full buildfarm coverage on it before Monday's
> wrap.
Sorry for being slow to respond, I was hoping to find time for testing but it’s
a scarce resource right now.
> The main argument in favor of #1 (restore use of -isysroot) is fear that
> Apple's going to force us into that sometime soon anyhow, so we might as
> well just bite the bullet instead of inserting weird workarounds to avoid
> it. But perhaps that isn't going to happen.
#1 is the option that appeals to me the most, mostly because it removes all
possible ambiguity of when/if it’s required compared to #2.
+ Most Postgres developers just turn off SIP, though.
Minor nitpick, shouldn’t this be <productname>Postgres</productname>?
cheers ./daniel
